Migration, Security, and Human Rights: Reconsidering Immigration Control - Research Paper Example

MIGRATION, SECURITY, AND HUMAN RIGHTS: RECONSIDERING IMMIGRATION CONTROL By + State Date MIGRATION, SECURITY, AND HUMAN RIGHTS: RECONSIDERING IMMIGRATION CONTROL 1 Outline I. Abstract The United Nations repaired the visa framework to call for meetings with each new applicant. For example, today, it is mandatory for immigrants to present credentials, including passports to travel back and forth the United States irrespective in their status to the country. These measures are an attempt to find offenders, terrorists, and other people considered a threat by the United Nations. In spite of all these measures, state borders have not been as effective in deterring or capturing offenders as national ones. As a result, immigration laws need to be considered in all members of the United Nations to curb these threats. The following paper discuses and critically analyzes reasons the states should reconsider immigration control through the reenactment of new or old migration requirements. II. Introduction The United Nations presented widespread background inspections for those desiring to travel to any country for leisure, academic, business, or visiting purposes. Border officials scan fingerprints as well as other screening procedures for travelling citizens and non-citizens (Alden, 2012). For instance, travelers lawfully allowed by respective administrations to step onto any member state of the European Union soil will do so while also being allowed to exit the nation. The United States Congress appreciates the determination of such a task. The most part of United States’ past on immigration law simply consisted of loose measures, particularly before September 2011. The selection commission should note that immigration laws today are loose because of receiving blows from reform policies to allow immigrants in a majority of nations. The goal of this paper is to demonstrate the need for securing migration, security, and civil liberties elements of immigration control in a majority of states in the United States (Alden, 2012). III. Literature Review In November 2012, John Boehner led Republicans in Congress in voicing the need to think through wide changes to immigration controls in 2013. These reflections focused on the role of Hispanic voters who helped President Barrack Obama another term in office by turning up in large numbers. In addition, Boehner, the House Speaker, stated reconsidering immigration law was part of averting a fiscal cliff, budget reductions, and tax increments in 2013. A key immigration reform was part of Congress’ goal at the start of 2013 (Nicholas, Lee, & Boles, 2012). This trend should be observed in all states since immigration control measures apply to all of them. A. As part of President Obama’s campaign pledges, immigration laws should undergo changes applicable to all states. As a result, this paper’s goal conforms to the president’s pledge for his second term, making it a direct contribution to all states. B. The United Nations offered significant support for the reconsideration of reforming immigrant control across the country. Postponing this issue will only increase the number of criminal cases associated with poor immigration laws or measures on national borders (Nicholas, Lee, & Boles, 2012). C. Reconsidering the immigration laws on a national basis is directly addressing the 11 million illegally residing immigrants in the United States. D. The European Union attempted to clear out unlawful immigration in February 2014. This is the first statewide practical act on reconsidering immigration control since the United States’ announcement in late 2012. E. The European Union is reconsidering placing immigration requirements involving pledges from all residents about their possession of legal papers under the United Nations. F. Since European Union is using voting to attempt to enact these measures, elections are a good starting point for the reconsideration of immigration control. IV. Points of Interest A. National borders are far more difficult to cross unlawfully today than any other country or time in the past. However, border control will never be flawless. It is impossible for such a powerful nation to form a faultless and secure border (Ibrahim, Bargerhuff, Krikorian, & Canty, 2007). As a result, a perfect border is not the goal of this study. B. Even when the United States has a deteriorating economy with increased unemployment, people from undeveloped nations will still want to migrate to the United States. Job visa measures and present immigration control does not largely permit such to enter the European Union and the United States. As a result, there is a growing organized crime issue. More and more sophisticated criminal systems earn increased profits for aiding unlawful immigrants to enter many developed nations (Ibrahim, Bargerhuff, Krikorian, & Canty, 2007). The only method for dealing with this trend today is reconsidering immigration control in every member of the United Nations. C. Rising border control measures have not simply discouraged unlawful immigrants, but citizens too. As a result, tourists, businesspersons, students, and legitimate citizens and noncitizens are negatively afflicted by this trend. This is another vital point to use for pushing for the reconsideration of immigrant control. V. Toughening Immigration Controls A. Apart from unveiling illegal substances and smuggled goods from immigrants, immigrant controls in all nations should make sure that there are only lawful channels for entering the United States (Alden, 2012). B. Today, it is much harder to evaluate how much the decrease of attempted unlawful immigrations. This is possibly because of administration by immigration agencies and the attraction of increased levels of illegal immigration in a weak global economy with decreased demand for immigrant employees. A recovering financial system should not prevent states from reconsidering immigration controls (Ibrahim, Bargerhuff, Krikorian, & Canty, 2007). C. The deterrence of unlawful immigration by border agencies is a completely different issue. This is because it is difficult to reflect on another problem that the public is utterly in conflict with the United Nations’ current viewpoint. Nations can win the people’s support for enacting immigration control by using the United States, European Union, and the United Nations policies as examples (Ibrahim, Bargerhuff, Krikorian, & Canty, 2007). VI. Conclusion A. Nations should reconsider immigration control to curb current and impending attempts to cross into the United States illegally. B. Nations should also reconsider immigration control to address the 11 million immigrants already residing within the United States. C. Future immigration can only flexible and secure through immigration controls. Political collaboration is necessary on a national basis to ensure border agencies follow new or reformed immigration controls. D. Reinforcing border administration can drastically reduce unlawful immigration in the future. E. The public mind closely relies on major events associated with immigration control like the September 2011 terror attacks. 2 Institutional Research Performance Managing immigration is one of the main priorities of developed and developing countries. The main targets for these countries in the management of immigration include security, the process of migration and human rights. This research will show that the management of immigration requires a paradigm shift. It is important for states to base their policy making on global justice. The concept of global justice supports cosmopolitism, based on the fact that the world has become globalized. Global justice considers people as subjects of justice. It calls for additional obligations of states. These obligations require states to allow immigrants into their territories. The use of global justice strategies will allow states to address issues regarding security and human rights. Global justice compels the international community to provide assistance to immigrants or burdened states in order to minimize the causes of migration. The information and results from the research should be published in scholarly journals for peer reviews and critical analysis (Greco, 2009, p. 31). The results of the proposed research will be published in two peer reviewed academic journals. The two journals are the American Journal of Political Science and American Political Science Review. The American Journal of Political Science is a peer reviewed journal published by an association called the Midwest Political Science Association. This journal has an impact factor of 2.397 according to the Journal Citation Report (Greco, 2009, p. 37). This impact factor places the journal third amongst the most cited journals in the political science category. This journal accepts articles on political science from different researchers. The American Journal of Political Science is also located on the Wiley’s Online Library. Publishing in this journal is vital for reaching a wide audience. The research will be availed to peers in the political science and history fields for analysis and critical reviews. The second journal is the American Political Science Review, which is a quarterly academic and peer reviewed journal. The journal covers all areas of history and political science. It is vital to note that the journal is the official journal of the APSA. The Cambridge University Press publishes this journal on behalf of the association. Established in 1906, the journal has the highest impact factor, 3.933 (Murray, 2013, p. 45). This ranks the journal top among journals in the political science category. The research paper can be submitted to a third academic and peer reviewed journal in case it is not published by the American Journal of Political Science and American Political Science Review. The third journal is the Annual Review. This is a non-profit journal that is peer reviewed. The Annual Review is a collection of 41 reviews from different disciplines in social sciences, political sciences and history. Each of the reviews has approximately 40 authoritative and comprehensive review articles. The major topics in this journal are covered on a yearly basis. The Annual Review is a journal that is widely used in research and teaching. It also serves the purpose of introducing new subjects and increasing awareness on current issues (Murray, 2013, p. 57). The impact factor of this journal is among the highest in the category of political science. In order to publish in this journal, a researcher is required to provide a list of future issues and summary points of the research. The journal does not specify the length and number of articles to be covered. However, articles are published in the journal after the reception of an invitation by an author who accepted authority to publish the material covered in a research. The Annual Review is available as electronic articles and bound annual volumes (Benson & Silver, 2012, p. 29). They are also available as subscriptions to both online and print versions. Purchasing a series of the journal gives permanent data rights to the purchaser. Publishing in alternative journals gives a research flexibility and option. In case the journals chosen declines to publish the proposed research, the researcher can turn to other journals for publication. There are approximately 50 university presses in the U.S that publish academic and peer reviewed journals (Morris, 2013). A researcher should select an alternative journal that produces scientific work. The primary purpose of the journal should be to contribute towards the development of knowledge within the field of political science. It should also provide reliable and sound sources or data and information to the public and members of a scholarly society (Gamage & Zadja, 2006, p. 71). 3 Reconsidering Immigration Control This evaluative research proposal reports on the need for governments and policy makers to reconsider immigration control methods. It is vital to note that developed and developing countries have prioritized on immigration control because of the fact that immigrants affects social, economic and political processes of the receiving country. In order to support policy makers as they make decisions and policies on immigration control, it is vital to provide the correct information based on comprehensive studies (Wetter, 2011, p. 39). This research proposal is beneficial because it is based on analytical and empirical evidence on the impacts of immigrants on a country. Additionally, this research will play a crucial role in the addition of value to the knowledge on immigration control. Local policy makers will benefit from the expertise and information that they will obtain from the research. Internationally, the research will highlight the plight of immigrants and the need to change how governments handle immigrants (Wetter, 2011, p. 44). The research will provide government agencies and policy makers with a platform for thinking critically as they embark on solving the problems caused by the immigration of people. The transferable skills that will be developed through this research are valuable and durable in the long term resolution of the impact of immigration on a country. There are several invalid reasons used by states to detain immigrants. Most of these reasons are often baseless, mostly hinging on national security. All the same, the immigrant often do not pose much security hazard. In fact, most of them are either visitors who are caught up with time, or individuals in need of occupation. The laws that determine security nations apply to everybody, including the inhabitants. This means that everybody is a hazard to national safety irrespective of their origin. For that reason, there must be equal handling of everybody (Meyers, 2004). There is the need for government authorities and policy makers to choose the least unpleasant or restraining measure to counter immigration control. It is assumed that detention is an appropriate measure. This is not true, and the research will prove its invalidity. In the research, it the validity of measures such as detention will be tested. Preliminary research indicates that detention has no grounds and it does not deter illegitimate migration in any way. There is a need for policy makers to contemplate the deterrence as a sensible rationalization for imprisonment of migrants. This research proposal has the ability to radically transform the society and its perceptions of immigration. Previously, immigrants were seen as threats to a country or society’s economy, health and security. The information that will be obtained from the research will show that immigrants have the potentials to contribute to the social, economic and political processes of a country. The main impact of this research will be to influence the fundamental understanding of global issues, which will lead to improved knowledge. It is expected that this research will be used by government agencies during policy and decision making processes. This will lead to the generation of better ideas and data, which will impact on the society (Wetter, 2011, p. 82). This research has an academic impact because it will influence other researchers to explore immigration. These academic impacts will be demonstrated through citation indicators. The research supports teaching and the acquisition of knowledge and expertise. This will contribute to the body of knowledge that will help policy makers and government agencies to manage social issues effectively. The research is a helpful input that will refocus the study of immigration, management and communication strategies. The data and information from the study will be used to rebuild relationships between states and immigrants living within their territories. The research will have an impact on several individuals who are affected by immigration control. Spurious entry should not be considered as a criminal wrongdoing, neither should illegal stay. As a matter of fact, they should not be considered as offenders. In most cases, they do not harm any persons or the properties of any individual. Through this research, the reasons for migration can be identified and proper measures of dealing with such cases formulated. In addition, there are diverse human rights concern that arises owing to the treatment of the immigrants (Meyers, 2004). For instance, they receive unsatisfactory medical attention when in detention. In addition, access to lawyers and family members who can aid them is limited. This leaves them defenseless. Some of the immigrants often cannot express themselves in the native language, a situation that means they may be locked up and suffer unnecessarily. Through this research, the need for translation services, contact with attorneys, and immediate medical attention will be addressed. Please consider funding the research because of the aforementioned reasons. This research not only addresses human rights issues, but also allows the country to open up opportunities for diligent and legitimate immigrants. In addition, children are often involved in such issues. Their interests are often overlooked because of the mistakes of the parents (Meyers, 2004). Through the preliminary research, relevant NGOs that can aid address these issues and work with the government and safekeeping forces were identified. This will make the research work easier in terms of resources and sources of information. References Alden, E, 2012, Immigration and Border Control, CATO Journal, 32, 1, pp. 107- 124, Business Source Complete, EBSCOhost, viewed 6 March 2014. Benson, P. J., & Silver, S. C., 2012, What Editors Want: An Authors Guide To Scientific Journal Publishing, Chicago, Ill, University Of Chicago Press. Gamage, D. T., & Zadja, J., 2006, Secrets of Scholarly Publishing in International Journals, Melbourne, James Nicholas. Greco, A. N., 2009, The State of Scholarly Publishing Challenges and Opportunities, New Brunswick, N.J., Transaction Publishers. Http://Search.Ebscohost.Com/Login.Aspx?Direct=True&Scope=Site&Db=Nlebk&Db=Nlabk&An=489867. Heyman, JC, 1999, Why Interdiction? Immigration Control at the United States–Mexico Border, Regional Studies, 33, 7, pp. 619-630, Business Source Complete, EBSCOhost, viewed 6 March 2014. Ibrahim, S, Bargerhuff, L, Krikorian, M, & Canty, R, 2007, PANEL: United States Border Control and the Secure Fence Act Of 2006, Administrative Law Review, 59, 3, pp. 569-587, Business Source Complete, EBSCOhost, viewed 6 March 2014. Meyers, E., 2004, International Immigration Policy: A Theoretical and Comparative Analysis, London: Palgrave Macmillan. Morris, S., 2013, The Handbook of Journal Publishing, Cambridge [England], Cambridge University Press. Murray, R., 2013, Writing For Academic Journals, London: McGraw-Hill International. Nicholas, P, Lee, C, & Boles, C., 2012, Republicans Reconsider Immigration Laws, Wall Street Journal - Eastern Edition, 9 November, Academic Search Premier, EBSCOhost, viewed 6 March 2014. Wetter, J. J., 2011, The Impacts of Research and Development Expenditures the Relationship between Total Factor Productivity and U.S. gross domestic product performance, New York, Springer. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-7530-0. Read More