Africa has received its fair share of US military influence in times of humanitarian emergencies and during the race for supremacy against the USSR. US military activities have in recent times taken three courses. The first being a direct approach through the US military outfit AFRICOM (Warner 6), military support through the American-led African Crisis Response Initiative (ACRI) (Omach 73) and lastly, in conjunction with other countries such as the recent intervention into Libya through NATO (North Atlantic Treaty Organization) (Shah 2011). US military involvement in Africa is a subject of much debate due to a number of factors. This study will analyze the reasons for US military intervention in Africa as put forth in literature and opinions before establishing a hypothesis to be tested through a survey to determine the reasons behind US military intervention. One of the reasons that the US has strongly used to justify or legitimize its military intervention in Africa is for the purposes of humanitarian aid. On several occasions, African states have degenerated into chaos and civil crisis with governments unable to protect their citizens such as Somalia and Comoros (Ramuhala 1). In my view, this explanation does not stand scrutiny since the US failed to intervene in Rwanda where genocide unfolded. In other instances, the US has intervened using military force in a bid to protect its own national security due to the advent of terrorism. African states may provide fertile grounds for terrorism breeding in two ways; direct support to terrorists or poor law enforcement. Libya, Somalia and Sudan have all been observed to train and facilitate terrorist activities such as Al Qaeda cells (Carafano and Gardina 3). This appears as a strong reason behind military intervention in Africa. Critiques of US military intervention in other countries including in Africa point out that it does so solely for own interests especially for the vast African resources. Political turbulence in the Middle East are shifting the attention of the US and other economic powers to African oil resources, with Dixon (2007) arguing that humanitarian intervention through military action is just a scapegoat for the US. I believe this is a strong reason especially in light of the fact that the US failed to intervene in Rwanda, the reason being lack of US national interests. A reason related to the previous one is based on global economic dominance. China, India and a resurgent Russia have made advances into Africa and placed themselves in a good position to gain access to important resources. Specifically, China has emerged as a strong challenger to the US. Africa is a key player in global economics, and the US uses military intervention whenever they get the opportunity to counter such competition (Dixon 2007). This to me appears to be a plausible explanation since the US position, as an economic superpower, is clearly under threat from the likes of China. Besides economic hegemony, the US is interested in maintaining its position as the world’s sole superpower, which involves diplomatic means, aid and economic partnerships. However, this objective may be pursued through military intervention in African states where political upheavals may be precipitated to dispose uncooperative governments, or cooperative governments supported against rebelling elements seen as not sharing similar ideologies to the US (Wright 2011). This is also a strong explanation since it was clearly at play during the Cold War. The US may also take advantage of political crises in Africa to accomplish revenge or removal of enemy governments from power. It is well documented that the US has on several occasions tried to remove Muammar Gaddafi
Cite this document
(“Ten Reasons why United States Intervenes in Political Crisis in Research Paper”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.net/sociology/2739-10-reasons-why-united-states-intervenes-in-political-crisis-in-african-countries
(Ten Reasons Why United States Intervenes in Political Crisis in Research Paper)
“Ten Reasons Why United States Intervenes in Political Crisis in Research Paper”, n.d. https://studentshare.net/sociology/2739-10-reasons-why-united-states-intervenes-in-political-crisis-in-african-countries.
Cited: 0 times
Ten Reasons why United States Intervenes in Political Crisis in African Countries: Survey Throughout its timeline as a superpower i.e. when it shared the title with the USSR and now as sole super power, United States has intervened in the affairs of other countries in several ways including militarily…
A political campaign refers to a planned strategy which makes an effort to have an impact on the process of decision making in a particular group of people (Laure, 2006). More often than not, in a democratic set up; political campaigns are processes that lead to selection of representatives or decision on referendums are made.
In the interest of seizing growth opportunities, another consideration is average population growth. This report makes recommendations for countries, taking into account the stated criteria and other relevant data. The management team researched population, in various countries of the world, and the following 10 countries have been identified as the most populous (in descending order): China, India, United States, Indonesia, Brazil, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Nigeria, Russia, Japan (Central Intelligence Agency, 2011).
898). Various explanations as to the root causes of the crisis have been given, essentially blaming it either on market failure (i.e. corporate mismanagement, Wall Street’s risky undertakings, and banks’ fraudulent practices and toxic instruments) or government failure (i.e.
Such goals often include price stability and low levels of unemployment. The US monetary policy impacts different aspects of financial and economic decision made in the country, for instance whether to purchase a house or establish a business or whether to put savings in bonds or stocks (Havrilesky 113).
It has been mostly observed in international politics that the U.S. mostly sets its objectives with the aim to protect its own national benefits in foreign policy. When it comes to evaluating its relationship with Israel, it is clearly understood that the U.S. doesn’t consider this approach.
It happened from 1775 to 1783 and involved the Americans resisting the British rule (Crawford 297). General Thomas Gage was the British commander in 1775 when a rebellion of property owners emerged and started to surround the British based in Boston. This shows that every American was ready to go to war to avoid the enslavement by the British.
This study will outline the spiritual, ideological and psychological way for tracing the course of Islamic expansion within the United States and how has the matter of race in the United States influenced the practices and the community experiences of black Sunni Muslims who conventionally see Islam as a color and race-blind religion
.It starts out by pointing out that at the annual meeting of the Inter-American Development Bank (IDB), there was a seeming role reversal as the usually debt-saddled Latin firms were riding high on an economic upswing.
Racism can be practiced anywhere, from work places, homes, states, politics and education systems among others. However, education systems seems to be one of the major places where the practice is vast and might as well be considered to be the root since, every individual
8 pages (2000 words)Research Paper
Got a tricky question? Receive an answer from students like you!Try us!
Let us find you another Research Paper on topic Ten Reasons why United States Intervenes in Political Crisis in African Countries: Survey for FREE!