Weber (1958) developed the concept of bureaucracy by studying power and authority and further discovered that several kinds can be identified. First, Weber described power based on the belief that rulers have natural rights to govern. This is often referred as the traditional power evident in kingdoms…
This power is commonly demonstrated by national and local leaders in several states.
Using a combination of these ideas, Weber developed a concept for structuring that included rigid hierarchical structures, defined authority, set rules and regulations, and a specification of tasks in an impersonal climate. (Yosef and Almond, 1973) This resulted to work being divided into parts, allocated among the relatively specialised workers, dispersing the responsibilities, and centralising authority to a small number of administrators.
Success has been observed among bureaucracies because these organisations stems from their ability to succeed at obtaining objectives and to work for big organisations. (Blau and Meyer, 1987) The structural attributes are maintained because of the reinforcing consequences achieved. Most important, bureaucracies maintain control despite the presence of uncertainties and the environment keeps on manifesting significant changes. (Beetham, 1974)
According to Mintzberg (1979), organisations are divided into: the operating core, which includes employees who produces the goods and services of the organisation and directly participating as support to production; the strategic apex, which consists of the individuals in the top management including their personal staff; the middle line, which serve as the bridge that has authority over the operating core and reports to the strategic apex; the techno structure are the analysts that uses several technical tools to ensure that organisations perform with efficiency; and the support staff, which provides indirect support to the other parts of the organisation.
In designing the organisation, several considerations have to be recognised. First, direct supervision is an important attribute that drives coordination through the proper relay of information and support in tasks. Authority is needed in organisations to ensure that policies are followed. Second, work and the subsequent processes have to be standardised. (Buchanan, 1985) Guidelines and frameworks have to be provided to the operation core to ensure that quality of products and services are maintained at higher levels.
Third, outputs have to be generalised to determine the performance the different components of the organisation. (Mintzberg, 1979) The task includes setting of performance measures and conspicuous output determinant such as quotas. Fourth, skills are vital such that standardisation is imperative. (Mintzberg, 1979) Constant training among workers has to be manifested along with the creation of networks for knowledge sharing.
Although most functions are standardised, organisations have to give room for creativity to grow. Innovation is considered as one the keys to survive the industry. (Mintzberg, 1979) Using the standards and rules, the employees can work and devise other approaches that will create better products. All parts of the organisation have to value the importance of creativity. Lastly, norms have to be regulated to create harmony in the workplace. Norms are also significant and affects the cultural backgrounds of different entities. Companies have to be founded on norms that are designed to improve the performance and to serve as the glue that will preserve the organisations.
Based on the discussion, it is clear that Mintzberg's idea was fuelled by the ...
Cite this document
(“Bureaucracy Book Report/Review Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 3000 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.net/sociology/292672-bureaucracy
(Bureaucracy Book Report/Review Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 3000 Words)
“Bureaucracy Book Report/Review Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 3000 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.net/sociology/292672-bureaucracy.
But bureaucracy and its characteristics has developed within the democratic countries of the world and limited the effectiveness of the democracy. The relation between bureaucracy and democracy will be also analyzed and provision for potential solution towards establishment of effective democracy will also be made.
The society in which they we live is constantly changing and adopting new ways of living. Ideally, people happened to be the causal element of this change but as much as they try to administer changes into the society, it still appears hard to break from the old societal habits (Ritzer, 2010).
This was such a big misappropriation that international aid also seemed to be vanishing from the country. The scenario was such that it gave authorities to point out at the World Bank and its officials for allowing the Cambodian officials who are related to corruption to escape, free from any liability.
Sociologists use these classical theories to reason and analyse how social action, social processes, and social structures work in different ways. Furthermore, the ideas of these theorists continue to be relevant to sociological theory today as modern theorists continue to refer to these classical theories in the current social events.
Woodside is highly impressed by the meritocratic civil services examinations of three Mandarinates which began in China as early as Tang Dynasty (618-907 C.E.). He gives eloquent details of the transparency in these examinations, moreover the social reforms thought at that time are relevant and needed to be addressed today also.
It can be seen, that from earliest recorded times groups of people have been organized to work together towards planned goals. Their efforts coordinated and controlled to achieve such outcomes. The management skills required to solve everyday problems in historic times have given us a base to formulate the modern management theories.
The employees operating at the ground level in a bureaucratic setup may end up feeling frustrated owing to a lack of say in the decision making processes, resulting in a high turnover rate (Stivers 5). For instance in a
the objective of describing CIA’s evolution with respect to the organizational aspects of the Directorate of Science and Technology (or DS&T) will remain at one of the main trajectories of this book review. Jeffrey T. Richelson a reputed intelligence community historian, and
While in the 1960s and the 1970s the prevailing objective of the discipline was attaining a consensus on the soundness status of principles, currently, the prime goal appears to be an improvement of new principle. Previously, new principle growth was considered a