It should be noted that the richest country in the world America has a substantial portion of people living below the
“In 2009, 14.3 percent of all persons lived in poverty” (Poverty in the United States, 2010). Nobody can say that America is not at all a developed country from the above figures. If America is not a developed country, no other country in the world can be labeled as developed. Poverty and development are two of the most popular topics in the current world. It is often said that poverty and development travel in opposite directions of they are inversely proportional. In other words, development takes place when poverty decreases or poverty increases when development decreases. This paper analyses the relationships between poverty and development and argues that true development takes place only when all the people in a country gets almost equal living standards.
Indicators of wealth, reflect the quantity of resources available to a society, provide no information about the allocation of those resources—for instance, about more or less equitable distribution of income among social groups, about the shares of resources used to provide free health and education services, and about the effects of production and consumption on people’s environment. Thus it is no wonder that countries with similar average incomes can differ substantially when it comes to people’s quality of life: access to education and health care, employment opportunities, availability of clean air and safe drinking water, the threat of crime, and so on (What Is Development?, 2004, p.7).
From the above description, it is evident that income distribution is detrimental in the income distribution in developed countries are even. Therefore, it is quite possible that a substantial portion of people in such countries may face poverty. According to Usborne (2008), “28 million people in the US will be