their own lives organizing their social interactions and relationships into a meaningful world and this is the foundation behind the study of sociology and the reality world by a cross section of sociologists. Therefore, a society is a group of people who shape their lives in aggregated and patterned ways and hence aiding how one group can be distinguished from the other in unique line such as tribe, family, education, culture or any of the subdivisions (Kerry & Jill, 2012). For a long time individuals have sought out an understanding of the meaning of life, their place in the society and the social world in totality. The book highlights the earlier explanations as one s based on tradition, superstition and myths hence the emergence of social sciences as a reality check for the whole world. Sociology is therefore, a systematic or scientific study of the human society and their social behavior right from the large-scale perspective and mass culture all the way to the small groups and individual interactions. Kerry and Jill define sociology as a study of the people doing things together. This therefore tells us the fact that the society and individuals are interconnected inherently, either depends on the other, and therefore the sociologists are endowed with the responsibility to study the fact that the society affects the individuals and individuals affects the society (Robertson, 2007). Although on the interactional level, lies are most of the time interesting in themselves, the social world comprise of lies which lack the basics for their continuance meaning lies have the tendency of coming to an end. In the same context, it is impossible to conceive of an inanimate globe of complete mistake or human being psychologically ability to survive (Smelser & Badie, 2004)....
Chapter 1: Sociology & the Real world
In the sociology field if any of these rise or fall so do the others (Kerry & Jill, 2012). The words interrelate so that if one intends to reflect on the other you have to invoke one and the devaluation of one diminishes the other. For example, the objective world is used synonymously with the real world and therefore truth is infused into this as it has describes correspondence traditionally. This is despite the fact that the aspects are vague amidst our mind set knowledge and inanimate objective reality (Smelser & Badie, 2004). The sociological perspective view of this underlies that one sense of objectivity is closely associated with a given form of social process that creates intersubjectivity i.e. how human beings with different actual experiences of the same things convince themselves that they live in a common world. Another approach to diverge on reality of the world is the argument that as long as there are leis there are always truths that such lies emanated from. Moreover, this is followed by the assumption that these terms are used in face-to-face interactions.
However, we ought to alongside the fidelity, the part played by the particular human beings brains in the formation of the three terms, and connect them to how the world responds to our limited actions and methodological initiatives which include:- micro sociology, where the studies are done on a face to face basis and through small group interactions.