This essay uses five examples of “real” life scenarios from movies and literature to explicate the ideas proposed in the perspectives of symbolic interactionism, social structure and personality (SSP), and group processes. In symbolic interactionism, people attach meanings to social life, during their interaction with others. According to Rohall et al., individuals are able to derive meanings from interacting with and forming complex relationships with others (26). As a result, these acquired meanings determine the behavior of individuals. This idea is well elucidated in “Carmen,” a short novel by Merimee who tells of the love story between Jose Navarro, a bandit, and Carmen, a gypsy. Before ever meeting Carmen, Navarro was a good soldier loyal to his country and safeguarding it against evils such as banditry. However, as Merimee writes, after breaking the law and allowing Carmen, who is charged with murder to escape, Navarro starts on a road towards self-destruction (23). According to Rohall et al., the way people interpret interactions is different, but these interpretations are the ones that guide their behavior. Rohall et al. state that according to the Thomas theorem, interpreting a situation as real makes it becomes real (33). Accordingly, Navarro’s relationship with Carmen causes him to commit treason, murder, and robbery, among other vices, all in the name of love.