Ranking of Jackson County Judges - Essay Example

Ranking of Jackson County judges Ranking of Jackson County judges Every year a number of cases are handled by judges in Jackson County. Some of these cases are appealed. However some of them are upheld. In connection to this the main aim of these study was to investigate how the judges perform based on the number of cases appealed and the number of cases reversed. This ranking was necessary to find out whether the judges are doing a great or not. Three courts were investigated: Municipal Court, Domestic Relations, and Common Pleas Courts. To get the probability of appeal: P (Appeal), the following formula was used; P (Appeal) = To obtain P (reversed), the following formula was used. P (Reversed) = On the other hand P (R/A) was gotten by P (R/A) = A. Common Pleas Courts Table 1: Ranking of the judges based on cases being appealed Judge Disposed Appealed P(A) Rank by P(A) Angela M. Mazzarelli 4523 23 0.00509 1 Richard T. Andrias 5231 61 0.01026 2 Rosalyn H. Richter 2176 36 0.01166 3 Rolando T. Acosta 3431 64 0.01654 4 Karla Moskowitz 3211 74 0.01865 5 Sallie Manzanet-Daniels 1567 43 0.02305 6 Leland G. DeGrasse 1537 53 0.02744 7 David Friedman 3215 33 0.03448 8 David B. Saxe 1236 46 0.03722 9 John W. Sweeny Jr. 3452 145 0.04200 10 Darcel D. Clark 3953 175 0.04427 11 Peter Tom 3252 211 0.06488 12 Judith J. Gische 2686 197 0.07334 13 Dianne T. Renwick 1257 123 0.09785 14 Paul G. Feinman 2164 262 0.12107 15 Helen E. Freedman 1054 216 0.20493 16 Figure 1: Bar Chart showing the ranking of the judges based on P (A) From figure 1 above it is evident that Judge Angela is the best performing judge in the Common Pleas Court followed by Richard then Rosalyn comes in third. However, based on this ranking Judge Hellen comes in last followed by Paul, who comes in second last and finally Dianne was third last based on the probability of appeal. Table 2: Ranking Based on the probability of cases being reversed for each judge. Judge Disposed Reversed P(R) Rank by P(R) John W. Sweeny Jr. 3211 2 0.00058 1 Angela M. Mazzarelli 5231 5 0.00111 2 David Friedman 3431 4 0.00124 3 Richard T. Andrias 2176 8 0.00153 4 Karla Moskowitz 3215 5 0.00156 5 Dianne T. Renwick 1236 2 0.00159 6 Rolando T. Acosta 1567 8 0.00233 7 David B. Saxe 1537 3 0.00243 8 Peter Tom 4523 9 0.00277 9 Helen E. Freedman 3953 3 0.00285 10 Judith J. Gische 2164 12 0.00447 11 Leland G. DeGrasse 3452 7 0.00455 12 Darcel D. Clark 1054 25 0.00632 13 Rosalyn H. Richter 3252 22 0.01011 14 Sallie Manzanet-Daniels 2686 31 0.01978 15 Paul G. Feinman 1257 53 0.02449 16 Figure 2: Bar Chart showing the ranking of the judges based on P (R) However, based on probability of cases being reversed Judge John comes in as the best judge followed by Angela and then David Friedman. Based on this ranking Paul Feinman comes in last and the second last position is taken by Sallie Manzanet-Daniels. Table 3: Ranking Based on probability of a reversal given an appeal Judge Appeal Reversed P(R/A) Rank by P(R/A) Karla Moskowitz 145 5 0.01379 1 Judith J. Gische 216 12 0.01389 2 Peter Tom 123 9 0.01626 3 John W. Sweeny Jr. 211 2 0.04265 4 Sallie Manzanet-Daniels 197 31 0.06091 5 Rolando T. Acosta 46 8 0.06522 6 David B. Saxe 74 3 0.06757 7 Richard T. Andrias 33 8 0.12121 8 Dianne T. Renwick 64 2 0.12500 9 David Friedman 61 4 0.13115 10 Helen E. Freedman 53 3 0.13208 11 Paul G. Feinman 175 53 0.14286 12 Rosalyn H. Richter 262 22 0.20229 13 Angela M. Mazzarelli 23 5 0.21739 14 Leland G. DeGrasse 36 7 0.61111 15 Darcel D. Clark 43 25 0.72093 16 Figure 3: Bar Chart showing the ranking of the judges based on P (R/A) Based on the probability of reversal given an appeal, then Karia Moskowitz is the best performing judge followed by Judith J. Gische. However, judge Darcel D. Clark is the least performing judge based on this system. Overall Ranking Table 4: Overall Ranking Judge Appeal Reversed Sum of Ranks Overall Rank Sallie Manzanet-Daniels 197 31 12 1 Judith J. Gische 216 12 17 2 Peter Tom 123 9 17 2 Richard T. Andrias 33 8 18 4 John W. Sweeny Jr. 211 2 20 5 Rolando T. Acosta 46 8 21 6 David B. Saxe 74 3 23 7 Dianne T. Renwick 64 2 23 7 Karla Moskowitz 145 5 25 9 Helen E. Freedman 53 3 29 10 Leland G. DeGrasse 36 7 29 10 David Friedman 61 4 31 12 Paul G. Feinman 175 53 33 13 Darcel D. Clark 43 25 36 14 Rosalyn H. Richter 262 22 38 15 Angela M. Mazzarelli 23 5 44 16 Figure 4: Overall Ranking Finally, the overall ranking of these judges is as shown in figure 4 above, it is, therefore, evident that Judge Sallie Manza is the best performing judge followed by Judith and then Peter Tom who completes the three best performing judges. B. Domestic Relations Table 5: Ranking of judges based probability of appeal [P (A)] Judge Disposed Appealed Reversed P(Appeal) Rank by P(A) William E. McCarthy 9321 8 3 0.00086 1 Leslie E. Stein 6572 21 6 0.00320 2 John A. Lahtinen 8362 43 3 0.00514 4 Edward O. Spain 6244 34 5 0.00545 5 Figure 5: Ranking based probability of appeal Based on this ranking William E. McCarthy is the best performing judge followed by Leslie and then Edward comes in last. Table 6: Ranking of judges based probability of reversal [P (R)] Judge Disposed Appealed Reversed P(Reversal) Rank Leslie E. Stein 6572 21 6 0.00032 3 William E. McCarthy 9321 8 3 0.00036 1 John A. Lahtinen 8362 43 3 0.00080 4 Edward O. Spain 6244 34 5 0.00091 2 Figure 6: Bar Graph showing ranking of the judges based on probability of reversal Using this ranking system Leslie is the best performing judge followed closely by William and finally Edward O. Spain comes in fourth. Table 7: Ranking Based on the probability of cases being reversed for each judge. Judge Disposed Appealed Reversed P(Reversal) Rank William E. McCarthy 9321 8 3 0.06977 1 Edward O. Spain 6244 34 5 0.14706 2 Leslie E. Stein 6572 21 6 0.28571 3 John A. Lahtinen 8362 43 3 0.37500 4 Figure 6: Bar chart showing ranking Based on probability of cases being reversed for each judge. The above graph indicates that based on the probability of reversal then William, McCarthy is the best performing judge, and Judge John A. Lahtinem comes in last. Overall Ranking Table 7: Overall Ranking of the judges Judge Disposed Appealed Reversed Sum of rank Overall Rank Leslie E. Stein 6572 21 6 6 1 John A. Lahtinen 8362 43 3 6 1 William E. McCarthy 9321 8 3 9 2 Edward O. Spain 6244 34 5 9 2 Figure 7: Bar Graph showing overall ranking of the judges The overall ranking is showing that Judge Elsie and John are the best performing judges under this category followed by William and Edward, who come in at position 2. C. Municipal Courts Table 8: Ranking of municipal judges based on probability of appeal Judge P(Appeal) Rank by P(A) Elizabeth A. Garry 0.008752 18 John C. Egan Jr. 0.007002 15 Peter Tom 0.004339 12 Angela M. Mazzarelli 0.002021 6 Richard T. Andrias 0.006061 14 David Friedman 0.003424 9 John W. Sweeny Jr. 0.011151 19 Rolando T. Acosta 0.00746 16 David B. Saxe 0.000515 1 Karla Moskowitz 0.001928 5 Dianne T. Renwick 0.000886 3 Leland G. DeGrasse 0.005284 13 Helen E. Freedman 0.002317 7 Rosalyn H. Richter 0.01278 20 Sallie Manzanet-Daniels 0.007696 17 Paul G. Feinman 0.003142 8 Judith J. Gische 0.001333 4 Darcel D. Clark 0.000611 2 Luis A. Gonzalez 0.003508 10 Leslie E. Stein 0.004261 11 Figure 8: Ranking of municipal judges based on probability of appeal From the figure above it can be seen that Judge David has the least probability of appeal therefore making him the best performing judge followed by Darcell and the least performing judge under this category is Rosalyn and then John comes in second last Judge on this category. Table 9: Ranking based on probability of reversal of cases Judge P ( R ) Rank Leslie E. Stein 0 1 Karla Moskowitz 0.000135 2 Sallie Manzanet-Daniels 0.000148 3 Elizabeth A. Garry 0.000305 4 Angela M. Mazzarelli 0.000321 5 Peter Tom 0.000466 6 David Friedman 0.000515 7 Leland G. DeGrasse 0.000579 8 John W. Sweeny Jr. 0.000585 9 Helen E. Freedman 0.000664 10 Dianne T. Renwick 0.000799 11 Judith J. Gische 0.000866 12 John C. Egan Jr. 0.001036 13 Rosalyn H. Richter 0.001065 14 Paul G. Feinman 0.001214 15 Luis A. Gonzalez 0.001377 16 David B. Saxe 0.001694 17 Richard T. Andrias 0.001704 18 Rolando T. Acosta 0.002357 19 Darcel D. Clark 0.01035 20 Figure 9: Ranking based on probability of reversal of cases From the chart above Judge Leslie is the best if the probability of reversal is used to rank the judges. However, judge Darcel is the least performing Judge based on this system. Overall Ranking Table 10: Overall Rank Judge Sum of rank Rank Leslie E. Stein 47 17 Karla Moskowitz 55 18 Sallie Manzanet-Daniels 34 8 Elizabeth A. Garry 33 2 Angela M. Mazzarelli 18 2 Peter Tom 19 4 David Friedman 32 1 Leland G. DeGrasse 40 5 John W. Sweeny Jr. 27 6 Helen E. Freedman 38 3 Dianne T. Renwick 5 7 Judith J. Gische 23 10 John C. Egan Jr. 28 9 Rosalyn H. Richter 45 11 Paul G. Feinman 38 13 Luis A. Gonzalez 45 14 David B. Saxe 13 9 Richard T. Andrias 22 12 Rolando T. Acosta 29 9 Darcel D. Clark 39 2 Figure 10: Overall Ranking of the judges From figure 10, Judge David is the leading judge followed by Angela and then Peter. On the same note, Karla is the least performing Judge followed by Leslie. In conclusion, this investigation has revealed that in the Court of Common Appeal Judge Sallie is the best performing Judge followed Judge Judith. However, Judge Angela comes in last in the overall ranking. On the other hand on the municipal category Judge Leslie is the best performing judge while Judge Edward is the least performing Judge overall. Finally, in the Municipal Courts Judge Angela is seen to be the one carrying out her duties diligently making her the best performing judge overall while Leslie is the last judge under this category. Reference Anderson, D.R., Sweeney, D.J., Williams, T.A., Camm, J.D., & Cochrane, J.J. (2015). Essentials of statistics for business and economics, 7th Ed. Mason, OH: South- Western Cengage Learning. Read More