Gender Differences Result in Social Construction - Essay Example

Gender differences result in social construction is a view which is present and linked with many philosophical theories about gender. If the point of view about gender roles are taken into account they are social constructed which means that the culture and the society is responsible for creating the roles which are considered to be ideal and also they are appropriate for a specific gender. There are some arguments according to which there are differences regarding the behavior existing between the women and men linked with the social conventions, this point of view was coming from the stronger sides, however as per the weaker sides the behavior is something which is defined by the biological and the universal factors to an extent but social conventions are also involved in having an impact on the gendered behavior. There are some theories which claim that there is more gender apart from the female and male version (Halvor, M 1997). Patriarchy is a universally accepted Trans cultural and Trans historical phenomena according to which women are oppressed everywhere by the men in a similar manner. Gender is an important part of the social construction along with gender being a process for stratification system and also a structure. There are day to day processes which are in forced by gender. One gender is different from another one on the basis of process, rituals of the daily life and also the conversations. Stratification is in which men as a group holds greater amount of power and status than women as a group. Women are treated as being some other species as compared to the men. Gender is responsible for dividing the work in the economic production as well as the home production (Litosseliti,L, and Sunderland J,2002). It legitimates the one which are in authority and they will organize the emotional life as well as the sexuality. The products created, tasks assigned, expectations from the job, value for money is different for both the genders in the society. Gender is something which basically displays women and men both of them to create along with control the workplace (Elizabeth G, 1992). Discourses refer to spoken communication along with the written communication. The denotations it holds include the discourse analysis along with the semantics which is a generalized concept of the conversations which exist in the contexts and also the modalities. There is a totality of the vocabulary which is used and is existent in the field of social practices long with the intellectual enquiry (Epictetus F, Dobbin,J,1998). An example of these can be taken from the religious discourse, medical discourse and also the legal discourse. There is a lot of work which is carried out on discourse and some of the work was carried out by Michel Foucault along with other social theoreticians according to which discourse is an entity of signs along with sequences having enouncements (Symeon, 1980). It is the communication of thought by words, conversations along with various talks which come under intelligent and earnest discourse. It is a formal discussion of a subject which appears in writing along with the speech. It is an integral part of the treatise, sermon and also the dissertation. Discourses are an important part of the linguistics which are an important part of the unit of writing and also speech which is connected (Machiavelli, N 1970) .Enouncement is an integral part of the discourses and it is linked with unit of semiotic signs along with the abstract construction which allows the signs to communicate and assign specific along with the repeatable relations between the objects, statements and also the subjects. This thus concludes that discourse is composed of semiotic sequences which have a relation among the signs which exist between and among statements, subjects and also the objects. White people are responsible for creating a dominant image of the world and they totally ignore an important factor that this thing is playing an integral role in constructing the world in their image and opinion. There are various studies which are carried out regarding the representation of white people in the western culture and different aspects which are important. Whiteness studies are basically an interdisciplinary arena of academic inquiry which focuses on the cultural aspects along with the historical aspects and sociological aspects of the people which are identified as being white. There is a social construction of whiteness which exists as an ideology which is tied and linked with the social status. Whiteness has been an important phenomenon in the history which also has been a major cause of social in justice along with the racism and inequality being existent and visible in various cultures and society. White people are preferred in every field and are considered to be more attractive and a better choice for all the fields. Whiteness is considered to be a superior thing and white people think of themselves being a higher race as appose to the blacks, yellow and even brown skins. Society is responsible for producing bias which is structured specially on the basis of the gender identities. This is constructed with the help of socialization process and it is an important part of the patriarchal ideology (University of Pennsylvania Press, 2003). There are various social theories which are visible and linked with the questions of disability identity which bridges the contemporary debates which includes the agency problem, structure, society dualism and even biology. It is important for everyone to purpose to survey all these issues along with finding out a way to deal with the dichotomies. Identity is a complex field along with social psychologists, cultural critics, philosophers and also political scientists. They all use the word in different contexts and in different manner. The demands and the needs of the development of social theory along with the political movements run in various contradictory directions. Identity varies and it is pragmatic and sometimes instrumental. They are more concerned and linked with nuance and complexities ( Barbara, H, 1993). Ethnic identities are socially constructed for clearing up ethnic violence. These are distinguished between two different classes of mechanisms. If individuals are the ones who view the agents for constructing identities, then in that situation constructive explanations exist for ethnic violence which tend to merge with analysis being there which stresses strategic action by both mass publics along with the elites (Daniel, B, 2008). If there are discursive formations then these agents construct the ethnic identities. All these constructivists’ explanations tend to merge with accounts which stresses on the internal logics of specific cultures. Learning disabilities are linked with progress which focuses on the needs of the individual students. In all these alternative formulation they have learning disabilities which reinforce a destructive discourse of the deficiencies which can sustain the dominant myths along with schooling, teachers, parent’s responsibility and also educational failure (Williams, Patricia J, 1998). Effective communication presents a lot of problems for the learning disabilities. There are various manners in which people with routine conversations can be treated. Social identity is taken into account for providing clearly written along with accessible introduction for the social anthropological approaches and also sociological approaches for the identity. Reflexive self identity is not a modern phenomenon with core argument being linked with collective and also individual identity (Campbell, John R,1999). It is associated with external and internal processes. Social identity is extremely important as it brings together sociological theories of identity. Lives of many women are touched by disability and there are various limitations which come along with people whom they care about along with institutionalized inequality which exist towards the women face which is less as compared to the reality of women who are suffering from the disabilities. There are many feminist and also disability communities which have failed to form a significant combination along with comprehending the women’s experiences of disability. There is a strong and deep connection between the disabilities and also feminism which blends political intellectual insights and personal factors which are associated with disability theory and also feminist theory. There are many issues which are linked with women with disabilities and also women caregivers. Disabilities are linked with community, reciprocity, and fatigue along with body awareness (Richard, J, 1996). There is a dichotomy which exists between the technology and nature along with the recovery programs and also codependence. Cultural standards along with the language, pace, cheerfulness, mother blaming, independence and also limits are confronted and made clear. There are many problems and challenges which are taken into account due to the political movements which emphasize productivity along with normalization for accommodating heroic and important aspects of the human condition (Amaryll B, 1994).These things are important for development in all the stages which makes one believe that death is not the worst thing which a person can face. Disability and also feminism is linked with the scholarly forces including the comprehensive survey of various specialized literatures along with putting light on the women’s autobiographical narrations with ability and also limitations (Lennard J. 2012). Overall one thing can be safely said to conclude the discussion that all these are liberating along with being bold. There is certainty in the development of disability rights and also feminism. There is a new and holistic view which can influence policy, change lives and also help in energizing the discourse. REFERENCE Moxnes, Halvor. Constructing Early Christian Families: Family As Social Reality and Metaphor. London: Routledge, 1997. Internet resource. Litosseliti, Lia, and Jane Sunderland. Gender Identity and Discourse Analysis. Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins Pub, 2002. Print. Traube, Elizabeth G. Dreaming Identities: Class, Gender, and Generation in 1980s Hollywood Movies. Boulder: Westview Press, 1992. Print. Epictetus , and Robert F. Dobbin. Discourses: Book I. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1998. Internet resource. Machiavelli, Niccolo?, and Bernard Crick. The Discourses. Harmondsworth, Eng.: Penguin Books, 1970. Print. Symeon . The Discourses. New York: Paulist Press, 1980. Print. Moss, Kirby. The Color of Class: Poor Whites and the Paradox of Privilege. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2003. Print. Williams, Patricia J. Seeing a Color-Blind Future: The Paradox of Race. New York: Noonday Press, 1998. Print. Bernardi, Daniel. The Persistence of Whiteness: Race and Contemporary Hollywood Cinema. London: Routledge, 2008. Print. Jenkins, Richard. Social Identity. London: Routledge, 1996. Print. Chanady, Amaryll B. Latin American Identity and Constructions of Difference. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1994. Print. Campbell, John R, and Alan Rew. Identity and Affect: Experiences of Identity in a Globalising World. London: Pluto Press, 1999. Internet resource. Hillyer, Barbara. Feminism and Disability. Norman, Okla: University of Oklahoma Press, 1993. Print. Williams, Val. Disability and Discourse: Analysing Inclusive Conversation with People with Intellectual Disabilities. Chichester, West Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell, 2011. Print Goodley, Dan, Bill Hughes, and Lennard J. Davis. Disability and Social Theory: New Developments and Directions. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan, 2012. Internet resource. Read More

 

Read More