Although many people argue that Riefenstahl, who is the director, stands out as a deliberate propagandist through this film, others argue that the form of propaganda exhibited is not as a result of her intention. This paper aims at reviewing this movie in light of the historical and philosophical context as far as the propaganda in it is concerned. How Propaganda Comes in To begin with, the proposition that this film absolves Riefenstahl from the propagandist role that this movie plays can be historically challenged. Even though Riefenstahl is in denial of having well understood the heinous nature of Adolf Hitler, history has its own reservations on the same. As such, her excuse can be dismissed as a simple and odd escapist’s excuse since someone with the creativity and originality akin to Riefenstahl’s is expected to see better, especially on an obvious issues such as the activities of the Nazis and create a film which opposes rather than supports such a movement. As it would be expected in a natural societal setting, Riefenstahl defends herself that she is not a propagandist and blames it all on her naivety and lack of knowledge on the real identity of Adolf Hitler and Nazism when she was forging out this piece of entertainment. On the contrary, one may find it necessary to argue out that this is just a way of freeing herself from the imminent guilt that she compromised truth so much in order to making money and gain fame using this film rather. Praising someone who is not humane might not trace one to a direct injustice but is tantamount to praising Satan, which does not leave him or her innocent anyway. As such, much as the content and style of this book might be delineating Riefenstahl from any form of propaganda, the historical and philosophical reality of the Nazi movement are in contradiction to what she presents. The fact that one of the major characters in this movie is Hitler himself leaves no doubt that Riefenstahl deliberately understood what burden of blame there was to carry as she produced this movie. In fact, this movie is a falsified presentation of the facts and the truths as they were during Germany’s historical times in as much as Nazism is concerned. For instance, the way the Jews were inhumanely treated over the years that was a key and most defining feature of the Nazi ideologies, a element of truth that is never presented in an objective manner in as far as this movie is concerned. Given the understanding that Hitler himself approached Riefenstahl to deliberately to have her produce this movie (Riefenstahl, 1935) also leaves little or no doubt that Riefenstahl was fully aware of the propagandist intention in Hitler’s heart and just wanted to use this movie as a tool to accomplish the same. Nothing points out to her denial of this, as there is no any form of evidence of her negotiation with Hitler on how best the reaction or taken care of the world would be tackled given the attempts of the movie to brainwash the people around. The way power has been presented in this movie can be seen as not only falsified but also vague in equal measure. (Reeves, 2004). In this movie, Hitler is brought out as someone who is out to surprisingly bring about cohesion among his people through the endearing speeches he gives to the masses of Nazi followers, which is in contravention of what people really knew about him. History
Cite this document
(“Triumph of the Will' absolve Leni Riefenstahl from responsibility for Essay”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.net/visual-arts-film-studies/88803-triumph-of-the-willyie-absolve-leni-riefenstahl
(Triumph of the Will' Absolve Leni Riefenstahl from Responsibility for Essay)
“Triumph of the Will' Absolve Leni Riefenstahl from Responsibility for Essay”, n.d. https://studentshare.net/visual-arts-film-studies/88803-triumph-of-the-willyie-absolve-leni-riefenstahl.
Cited: 0 times
Triumph of the Will absolve Riefenstahl from responsibility for its Nazi Propagandist impact Indicate your name here Student’s grade course Date Introduction Among the many existing disputes and controversies underlying the roles of art is the production of materials which are termed to be propagandist by the audience and analysts…
It is a wonder, for example, how Hitler and Nazi Germany, had perpetuated the annihilation of millions of Jews under the very noses of the German people or how many other dictators such as Mussolini and Stalin had managed to hold on to power for so long despite their largely repressive style of governance.
TRICARE prime refers to the managed care option given to military working age retirees and the members of their families. This prime was intended to avoid spending cuts that would affect readiness indirectly. McCain’s proposal is bond to cause serious impact if put into use.
After the failed revolution that Castro planned, the court trials that followed led to his famous speech “History Will Absorb Me” that he delivered during his last trial. Castro has had a lot of influence on the Cuban politics. Later after his imprisonment, Castro became the president of Cuba.
Is this a socialist document? Introduction On July 26, 1953, Fidel Castro, a lawyer and a member in the Orthodox Party had led a couple of Cuban revolutionaries to attack the Moncada military barracks situated in Santiago de Cuba. The attack was made in an attempt for securing weapons in order to support their struggle to overpower the dictatorship of Fulgencio Batista.
This happens in a wide range of work related activities but can be aggravated when the employees feel that they have been neglected or lack the support from both the employers and work colleagues especially when they have little or no control on how to cope with work pressures and demands.
Soft determinism philosophers' view is that free will and moral responsibility can be combined with determinism. Libertarianists suppose that that all our actions, decisions and their results depend on us, they are result of rational agency, but not of chance or luck.
The Industrial Revolution drew workers of both genders into the cities to work, changing the long-held ideology that women’s roles were domestic. With more women in the workforce, retailers recognized a new demographic.
Railways assisted the Europeans in breaking free of the hurdles of distance and time. Many scholars mutually consent that the “introduction of railways was the single most powerful initiator of economic takeoffs which allowed European societies (and later North
An example of a piece of art that continues to be looked at as controversial and propagandist is the film/movie Triumph of Will (Riefenstahl, 1935). Although many people argue that Riefenstahl, who is the