Technology & Human performance: The case with oscar pistoris - Research Paper Example

In 2004, Oscar competed in the 2004 Paralympics in Athens, Greece where he won gold medal in the 200 m race and bronze in the 100m race. The International Association of Athletics Federations (IAAF) has banned decided not to give Oscar the permission in racing against the able bodied sports with the notion that it will be providing an advantage over the able bodied runners. This ban was later declined by the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS). The athlete uses J shaped carbon fiber prosthetics recognized as Cheetah Flex-Foot.

The device or the flex foot looks like blades and so is nicknamed as “the Blade Runner” (Oscar Pistorius: Case study). Oscar wears Cheetah which was invented by US amputee Van Phillips and now produced by the Icelandic firm, Ossur. With the help of prosthetic limbs Pistorious enjoyed an active childhood and he became an accomplished athlete in his secondary school (Oscar Pistorius gets medal shot after South Africa win relay appeal). The blade style leg initiated the storage of energy like a spring reusing it at the vital instant when the leg pushes off from the ground.

Oscar’s leg was able to return 90 percent of the energy which it stored which is far short of the 250 per cent return by a real leg (The race is on in the hi-tech Paralympics). The wonder of engineering along with rock solid mental and physical toughness made the man Oscar Pistorius an icon of uniqueness and spirit of sportsmanship in true sense of term within millions of people in the world. Maintenance of engineering ethics Engineering ethics is a branch of professional ethics which is opposed to personal morality (Promoting Ethics in the Public Service, xvi).

Proper teaching of engineering ethics can lead to the increase in the knowledge of the person with relevant standards. A person associated with the maintenance of code of engineering ethics is on an advantageous position and is more likely to know than a person who is not in touch with it. Anybody who is liable to answer questions about the code of ethics is more likely to explore the relevant provisions that a person without being in touch with engineering code of ethics and not liable to answer.

The knowledge of standards involves knowing more about what is written in the code books with partial knowledge can be represented as the rationale for them. As an instance it could be said that in a classroom students generally take into the operating costs at the time of designing is directed towards pointing out how uneconomical the design is if they don’t. The teaching of the engineering ethics leads to the improvement of the ethical judgment. Like that of technical judgment, the realms of ethical judgment also improve with the use.

Ethical judgments will lead to a proper evaluation rather than in the situation where the person does not receive any experience (Harris et al, 93). Thus ethical perspective is highly significant while discussing the case of Oscar Pistrious. The paper will try to answer the position that “Oscar Pistrious is not a perfect choice for Olympic Games”. Ethical paradox Now some serious questions generate here regarding the visualization of the athlete, Oscar Pistorious. He is no doubt a marvelous athlete with a vanguard figure making a brave attempt to test his real potential at the 400m sprint and the agony to show the world that a man without two foot can surpass the pace