This essay analyzes the rhetorical (persuasive) strategies used to make the argument in the Gasland documentary. In doing this, I will identify the thesis of the documentary. Ideally, I will focus on Focus on three areas, which include speech, sound, and visuals…
The thesis of the documentary seeks to inform the audience on the environmental effects and human effects from natural gas drilling. Indeed, the documentary uses dark humor to discuss a detailed analysis on the broader effects of the controversial extraction method, hydraulic fracturing, or fracking that is rampant across the globe. The documentary seeks to negate the assertion that natural gas is a clean and safe alternative to oil. In addition, the documentary confirms that the fracked wells leak more often thus polluting the environment through water and air pollution, which endangers the environment and disturbs families (Fox Film).
Rhetorical (persuasive) Strategies in the Documentary
Notably, the documentary uses the three persuasive strategies, which include logos, pathos, and ethos. Moreover, the documentary uses rhetorical devices to apply the persuasive strategies to support the argument. In this context, I will focus on sound, speech, and visual images in discussing the rhetorical (persuasive) strategies in the documentary....
The speaker further says that, “a great deal of faith in people that we wouldn’t succumb to frenzy, or rage, or greed; that we’d figure out a solution without destroying the things that we love (Fox Film).” This comes in a convincing tone that asserts respect for the environment. More so, Josh Fox says that the proposal from the natural gas company to lease Fox’s family land for purposes of drilling natural gas generated a debate in the family. Indeed, Fox’s father initially had the thought of leasing the land for the $100,000 offer (Fox Film). On the other hand, Fox tells his father, ‘I think I have to look into this, so give me some time to go ahead and get the facts.” Indeed, even though, Fox said this in a commanding voice, Fox’s father allowed him to seek for facts and evidence regarding the effects of hydraulic fracturing on the community neighboring the drilling site. In fact, Josh Fox is the dominant narrator in the documentary where he gives a personal story. He engaged in interviews, discussions, and debates seeking to unearth the possible environmental effects of hydraulic fracturing. As a result, the film offers facts and evidence in spoken form through the interviews. We can actually experience Josh Fox talking with residents suffering from chronic health ailments that relate to air pollution and water contamination from the drilling of the natural gas using the hydraulic fracturing (Fox Film). This offers facts and evidence in spoken form through the discussions. More so, the residents report on their quest for justice where they visited the court to get an injunction seeking for damages from the natural gas companies. The court injunction mandated the ...
Cite this document
(“GASLAND Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.net/english/102419-gasland
(GASLAND Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 Words)
“GASLAND Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.net/english/102419-gasland.
As asserted, the documentary aimed to persuade the viewers through rhetorical arguments of speech, sound, and visuals that there is a need to be alarmed at the rate hydraulic fracturing for natural gas drastically and negatively affects the lives of people who are affected by the drilling; and hopefully move policymakers and legislators into amending provisions of the Safe Drinking Water Act.
It is a fact that most of the activities which are addressed by environmentalism involve the pollution of the environment through industrial activities such as the extraction of natural gas by oil and gas companies. The documentary Gasland is an attempt to create awareness, within the American public, of the effects of that attempts made by gas companies to extract natural gas in rural America have on the environment.
Academic search complete. Web. 14 Oct 2013. Hydraulic fracturing entails the natural gas and oil extraction from the ground with the use of proponents and silica proppant is most used. Based on the geological conditions aluminum pellets, artificial ceramics, coated with resin sand and bauxite sintered is applicable; the NIOSH field report confirms that inhaling crystalline silica can cause silicosis, kidney disease, autoimmune disorders, lung cancer and tuberculosis.
http://www.pnas.org/content/early/2013/10/09/1304880110.full.pdf+html. The article presented measurements of methane gas emissions reportedly from the production of natural gas in 190 locations within the United States. As disclosed, the information collected and revealed could be used by policymakers regarding natural gas production and use.
On the other hand, gas mining companies who use hydraulic fracturing to access gas in shale rocks argue that in comparison to other sources of energy such as coal and oil, fracking is more environmental friendly. Amidst these arguments Josh Fox, an American film producer made a documentary to show fracking has negatively affected the people of United States of America.
that can be readily obtained. As a function of analysis, this brief essay will seek to consider the means whereby fracking is damaging to the environment; while at the same time providing key economic benefits to those individuals affected by means of cheaper fuel and the jobs that the process necessarily creates.
In this comprehensive analysis, the documentary itself has been thoroughly explicated and then related to the contemporary and current trends in the process of gas drilling, in commercial and privatized sectors. This detailed and well-conceived study guide I seek to offer a dynamic insight into the conceptualizations and socio-economic realities associated with the documentary and the process of gas drilling itself.
Some of these effects have been found to be based on the pollution of air which has left the once pristine natural environment in a mess of polluted air. The fact that fracking has been adopted in the United States is one of the most controversial events in the American public because of the strong support and opposition, in equal measure that has been given for this process.
Perhaps most people thought that he was an organic farmer after manure spread which is not the case. In addition, there are false claims that fracking is related to cancer rates, because of toxic spill from coal mines and pollution and health problems which actually is not the case.