Company Law Case Study

Masters
Case Study
Law
Pages 6 (1506 words)
Download 0
There are no rules, other than the principles of fairness and justice, to dictate when the court should lift the veil of corporation, rendering therefore the parent company liable for the debts of the subsidiaries."
In this period of recession which is experiences in all parts of the world, many are inclined in going into business…

Introduction

These people are called "owners", composed of the incorporators, directors, and the stockholders. Another point to consider is that a corporation, once approved, has a legal personality separate and distinct from its owners. Having a legal personality separate and distinct from its owners gives the corporation a limited liability to shareholders. Limited liability is a legal doctrine which means that if a "plaintiff wins a court judgment against the corporation, he (the plaintiff) cannot satisfy the judgment out of the personal assets of the owners, rather, the plaintiff must collect from the assets of the corporation".2 Limited liability is likened to a "veil" that offers the owners of the business protection for their personal assets, like for instance, if one of the co-owners or employees commits an unlawful action that injures someone, or if someone sues the corporation for non-payment of debt.3
But is the limited liability doctrine absolute The answer is it is not.4 The corporate law protection of limited liability can be lost through 1) piercing of the corporate veil, 2) defective incorporation, 3) improper signing of documents.5 This essay aims to discuss piercing the corporate veil by first explaining the limited liability rule followed by ...
Download paper
Not exactly what you need?

Related papers

company law, study case
1 Thus, in Rolled Steel Products (Holdings) Ltd v British Steel Corporation the disputed transaction was not held to be void. The court came to this decision as the transaction was not wholly beyond the capacity of the company.2 The directors of a private company with just one class of shares are permitted to allot the same class of shares. In addition, they can convert securities into such…
organisation law case study
This clearly indicates the intention of Yana and Su to promote their own company’s interests rather than the interests of Free Spirit Pty Ltd. Yana Yana is an executive director of the company. To determine whether she had fulfilled the obligations as a director, prescribed by the provisions of the Corporations Act 2001 and the common law, the following issues have been taken up for discussion.…
Business Law/ Case Study
However, Chetum disagrees with this decision and sue him for breach of contract. To prove defamation under the rule of law, it requires a false statement concerning plaintiff, or of fact causing damages and published to a third party. Regarding public issue or person, defamation the plaintiff must attest that the statement is false, as well as that defendant acted with malice or knew of its truth.…
Company Law Master Case Study
The address of such place will have to be intimated to the Registrar of companies and Madona can find the address of the place from the registrar in case such a regulation has been made in this respect.…
COMPANY LAW / Case Study
However, she has not been paid her emoluments, although the other directors have been duly provided with their full emoluments.…
Company Law Case Study
These people are called "owners", composed of the incorporators, directors, and the stockholders. Another point to consider is that a corporation, once approved, has a legal personality separate and distinct from its owners. Having a legal personality separate and distinct from its owners gives the corporation a limited liability to shareholders. Limited liability is a legal doctrine which means…