Brief a case

Masters
Case Study
Law
Pages 1 (251 words)
Download 0
Police Officer Danny Reynolds, who works for the Indianapolis Metropolitan upon seeing a vehicle with a damaged headlight, approached the car to speak to the driver, Washington. Upon reaching the vehicle the officer inquired whether there were any weapons present onboard…

Introduction

Despite the presence of a valid handgun permit the officer issued Washington a summons to show in court.
The key issue is that of Melvin Washington’s interlocutory appeal in retaliation of the court’s denial of his motion that demands that all evidence discovered while the vehicle was searched be repressed. He states that the search was in direct violation of the Fourth Amendment of the US Constitution and also that of Article 1, Section 11 of the Indiana Constitution.
On November 12, 2008, Washington was charged by the State for the possession of marijuana, as a Class A offense and a Class C infraction for not having fully functional headlights. On 29th April, 2009, Washington appealed to suppress the drugs found in his vehicle. This motion was denied by the court on the 18th of May, after an analysis of evidence and briefs from both parties. However the court accepted Washington’s interlocutory appeal in August.
The justification for the bases of the decision taken by the court is primarily focused on placing a paramount importance on officer safety. The action taken by Officer Reynolds was therefore relevant as he conducted a search for the weapon in order to ensure his safety.
There are divergent opinions pertaining to the case mostly because of the lack of a warrant obtained in order to search the vehicle when no prior suspicion was aroused and Washington has cooperated to the fullest. Hence there was no legitimate concern for the officers safety or any solid bases to believe if any crime was or had been conducted. Based on this notion the search was illegal and hence the evidence it resulted in should have been ...
Download paper
Not exactly what you need?

Related papers

Case brief 2
Rogers, 131 S.Ct. 2507 Vote: 5-4 I. Facts of the Case A family court in South Carolina order that the appellant pay a weekly sum of $51-73 in child support. The appellant was held in contempt on five separate occasions. Upon release the family court submitted a show cause process since the appellant was in arrears. At the civil contempt hearing the appellant was not represented by legal counsel…
Case Brief : Terry v. Ohio
Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 (1968). This Case Brief will discuss the factual matrix of this case followed by the ratio decidendi as laid down by the hon’ble Supreme Court. This Case Brief also aims at answering some of the following questions: 1. Were Terry and the other men in violation of the Fourth Amendment? 2. What was the position of law before Terry v. Ohio? 3. What analysis did the court make in…
Terry v. Ohio Case Brief
In this particular case, the supreme court may have actually eased the requirements pertaining to probable cause for the benefit of the protection of many. Hence their decision to allow police officers to conduct a limited search of a person whom they suspect of having ulterior motives in what they deem to be questionable actions based upon their observation of a person or group of people.…
wk6 case brief con law
On the court proceedings, key factor, which played significant roles, included warrantless search, exigency and fourth amendment. Facts Various facts prevail in the case of Kentucky v. King, 563 U.S (2011). First, the police acting while undercover in October 2005 discovered the presence of marijuana in an apartment complex. This was the police from Kentucky Lexington-Fayette Urban County. Upon…
Case Brief
While the plaintiff does not have her palimony agreement in writing, because she filed her claim before the enactment of the new legislature, the judge ruled the amendment does not apply to her case. In doing such, the judge further ruled to deny the defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint and the defendant’s counterclaims.…
Brief a case
Despite the presence of a valid handgun permit the officer issued Washington a summons to show in court.…
wk6 case brief con law
This was the police from Kentucky Lexington-Fayette Urban County. Upon arrival at the door, their suspicion were confirmed to be true when they smelt marijuana. They also announced their presence at the door while notifying the occupant of their intent to get into the house. According to the fourth amendment, a search must be reasonable to allow exploration without a warrant if a probable cause…