Got a tricky question? Receive an answer from students like you! Try us!

Is Frankenstein Guilty of Crimes Againts Nature? - Research Paper Example

Only on StudentShare
High school
Research Paper
Philosophy
Pages 5 (1255 words)

Summary

The vicious mistake that a reader can most likely commit while reading Mary Wollstonecraft Shelly’s “Frankenstein” is to interpret the protagonist’s attempt to create life as an act of going against nature and the will of God. The premise of Frankenstein’s crime…

Extract of sample
Is Frankenstein Guilty of Crimes Againts Nature?

But this proposition of Frankenstein’s crime against nature can be challenged by a simple rhetorical question, “Does Frankenstein create a real monster?” Textual evidences ultimately show that Doctor Frankenstein has not created a real monster as per the assumption that man cannot grasp the secrets of life and death; rather his ignorance about how to nurture his creature that apparently looks like an evil causes the final havoc he suffers in the end of the novel. By successfully creating a childlike imitative being, in the very first place he proves that the secrets of life and death are obviously knowledgeable by man. Meanwhile he nullifies the supposition that seeking the secrets of life and death is nothing profane. But Frankenstein’s true crime is that he abandons his creature immediately after its birth. Obviously this crime is caused by his ignorance about his responsibility that greater knowledge imposes upon him. Thus Frankenstein commits crime against nature by refusing to play the motherly role of nurturing the creature; but not by seeking the secrets of life.
Mary Shelly’s scheme to humanize the monster essentially refutes the claim that man should not, more accurately cannot, achieve knowledge beyond what nature allows. The horrible look and ferocious appearance of Frankenstein’s creature are not enough to prove his failure to achieve the unknowledgeable. Indeed his success lies in his ability to create a being that can learn; that possesses a mind and the essence of man. Frankenstein commits crime against his creature by abandoning it. Indeed his crime does not seem to be a deliberate one. Rather it evolves from his ignorance about the truth of his creature’s nature. If Frankenstein were responsible enough, instead of being repulsed by the creature’s horrible look he could train him to be socialized. But like ...
Download paper
Not exactly what you need?

Related Essays

Nature of Philosophy
According to Nash (2010), the nature of philosophy is the way people live and view the world. It points out clearly how people live a life without a god. Nash (2010) argues further that philosophy is a way of comprehending the world around us. This implies that its nature includes the ability to view something and interpret it into realities that make sense to us. Philosophy has a vital purpose to us. It helps us apprehend what world view is. We are able to attain a good understanding of our own world views. It guides us to improve our own ways of viewing the world. Philosophy makes us become…
6 pages (1506 words)
Frankenstein (1818 Book)
Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein effectively renders the audience horrified at the chief thought that humans themselves can create life from the dead. Through science, the epistemological capacity of Shelley’s work reflects the possibility to explore the yet unknown so that by fiction, it is able to promote varied concepts whose substance may impress upon a range of perceptions from being a magical wonder to an object of fright. The ensuing madness in Victor as a science student who has severely detached himself from the norms of the living to defy human limits potentially makes a horrifying…
4 pages (1004 words)
Satre Nietzsche & Human Nature
Actions of the human beings define their essence and identity. Thus, a self-development of an individual depends on his actions. In case an individual lives in the society and his actions are predetermined and compared with the actions of other people, then there is a direct influence exerted on an individual’s identity. Social actions determine an individual’s essence. This is interpretation of the existence preceding essence. A feeling of responsibility is reflected in an individual’s feeling of anguish. A personal choice of an individual determines destiny of all other people and…
3 pages (753 words)
In Frankenstein and Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep-self and other begin to blur
Therefore, nothing in existence can have an independent or ultimate existence. Everything is empty of independent existence because it is co-dependently originated. Therefore, it is important for people to experience. The self and the world change from one moment to the other and are mutually independent. This paper will examine the changing adherence to these foundations by artificial beings in Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep and Frankenstein. It will also examine evidence in the novels that the artificial men are more human than human beings in their search for experience. Both texts…
5 pages (1255 words)
Philosophy of human nature
Humans are the only beings who realize their mortality and are able to make a death the most sensational topic for discussions. Inevitability of own death is accepted by people not as an abstract verity but something that is able to bring the biggest emotional shock and touch the deepest feelings of personal inner world. To find the answers on the questions of life sense and existence of life after death, mythology, religion, philosophy and even art present numerous arguments to support both sides of the coin. The theme of life and death is everlasting and essential for the spiritual culture…
7 pages (1757 words)
Thomas Hobbes views on Hate Crimes
In relation to this, aversion refers to the state of being repelled by the object that one hate and this refers to the presence of the object, which in turn leads to the hate for the object (Herbert 98). The above is a strong view on hate crimes in that it is based on this that he is able to place a distinct definition to depict the difference between love and hate, and how the two relate to one another. This is by definition of the presence and absence of all the aspects of an object or the object in its entirety to e hated or loved. As such, hatred is the presence of that which one would…