You must have Credits on your Balance to download this sample
Khatchadhourian’s arguments and the Walzer’s post 9/11 discussion.
Pages 5 (1255 words)
Terrorism is defined as activities which incorporate mass destruction and innocent killing on the national level. Wars usually involve the use of force to solve disputes and it only occurs between politically active communities.
Wars usually involve the use of force to solve disputes and deadlocks regarding governance based issues and, it only occurs between politically active communities. The acts of terrorism by countries usually involve the killing of children and women while the consequences are faced by the affected families and economies over a very long time period (Primoratz 25). Wars can never be justified as they incur large scale loss of innocent lives and destroy the overall natural and human resources of the country. However, history holds some critics and analysts who have supported the idea of morally justified terrorism. This idea basically revolves around the situations in which terrorism and mass killing becomes the only option through which societies and nations can save themselves from slavery. This paper aims to identify an example of morally justified act of terrorism with reference to the Khatchadhourian’s arguments and Walzer’s post 9/11 discussion. This topic would be of prime concern for people who believe that terrorism can never be justified. Thesis Terrorism can be morally justified in such a condition when a particular nation is subject to mass scale destruction if it does not get involved in such activities to save its existence. ...
Not exactly what you need?