This was an effort not to assist Brenda but rather accomplish his project and gain his information to report to the anxious world.
He reports the case to be successful despite the efforts being fruitless as Brenda developed masculine behaviors and. He also ignores the welfare of Brenda, among his recommendations he suggests that the truth be hidden from her. This where the reason behind the psychological trauma David (previously Brenda experienced earlier in life. Dr. John Money lacked future predicting and was short sighted he ignored the life time implications hi action would have both on David and future related transgender cases (Colapinto, 2000). The sexologist controversial argument lacked scientific prove and only used it for personal gains. The failure on the case was due to the fact that David no sexual differentiation which made it a case study he lacked guideline since he had no defined period at which the project could be considered a success . These traits made Dr. Money to be controversial in his choices and theory.
Throughout the text Dr. Money is seen to be controversial and selective in making choices. It is evident on how his influence affected even her students. The sexology maintains the same traits and is quick to defend choices. After the failure of his case he blames the parents for not adhering to the guidelines provided and termed their late decisions as the main contributors of the failed project. This indicates how he failed to acknowledge when matters failed. He failed to admit his failures; he continued to deceive people that the whole process was a success even thought Brenda had reverted back to David (Colapinto, 2000). The case shows a man who fails in his attempts and is slow to admit but rather shifts blame in order to protect his reputation. He is egocentric and provides reasons behinds every failure. As a case study he ought to have included more parties that would evaluate his progress on the case. The lack of scientific