Why Bankstown and Fairfield Are the Best Locations for the Establishment of the Child Care Centers - Statistics Project Example

1.0. Introduction Trust, quality of services and the prices that the outside school hour care centres provide and assures their customers determines the adoptability of the service by those in the areas who have children that need to be taken to the centres. There may already exist such outside school hour care centres that have been established by the government to provide the same services. However, due to mismanagement issues, the performance of such institutions is not the best and the development of private a private institution that guarantees quality To determine the location of the outside school hour care centres a number of key factors will be put into considerations. This includes the areas where there is not adequate access to the outside school care at present. Similarly, the proportion of working parents in the area should be high and their income should be equally high and the income should have low variability. Other important factors to consider include the proportion of children in the area within the intended age group. Finally, the proportion of new migrants or internal migrants into the area should also be considered. This will determine the rates of unpaid children care occurring. The report with require that a random sample method be done to select a total of six Local Government Areas (LGA) from the 2 Zones. The variety of charts and graphs will then be used to compare each of the zones statistically to determine the most suitable zone for the new organization to be established. 2.0. Methodology The plan is to start two outside school hour care centres; one should be within the Sydney local government area and the other should be from a zone from a local government area outside of Sydney. The methodology aims to provide for the decision to build the childcares each on one of the chosen local government areas. The local government areas will be separated into two main zones. The first zone will be zone 1 which will be investigated will be the local government areas in Sydney and Sydney itself. The zone 2 regions will comprise of local government areas outside of Sydney. The three local government areas will be randomly selected in each case. Any three from the sample on each of the two zones will be selected for analysis to decide the local government area that best serves to provide the highest returns when childcares are established. In light of this research methodology, the selected local government areas in zone 1 will be Bankstown, Warringah and Kogarah. The areas that will be selected for analysis in Zone 2 will be Ashfield, Fairfield and Murray. 3.0. Statistics Analysis 3.1. Zone 1 3.1.1 Existing child care institutions in the region LGA Warringah (A) Kogarah (C) Bankstown (C) Total Pre-school 3214 903 3200 7317 Infants/Primary - Government 8637 2661 9156 20454 Infants/Primary - Catholic 1942 966 3991 6899 Infants/Primary - Other Non Government 1609 424 2451 4484 Total 15402 4954 18798 39154 The number of existing care institutions in the areas determine the success that a new institution will have in the region. More institutions in the area will mean that the distribution of the children in the institutions is proper and as a result, it will be hard for a new institution to be established. The areas that best serves as a destination for a new institutions is Kogarah which has a total of 4954 followed by Warringah with a total of 15402 and finally Bankstown with a total of 18798. 3.1.2. Population density Bankstown (C) 182352 Kogarah (C) 55807 Warringah (A) 140740 Total 378899 LGA Warringah (A) Kogarah (C) Bankstown (C) Total 0-9 years 19702 6469 26968 53139 10-19 years 16343 6822 25528 48693 Total 36045 13291 52496 101832 The census identified that Bankstown to have the biggest population of 182352 followed by Warringah with 140740 and finally Kogarah which has the smallest population among the three of 55807. The local government authority that would come second would be Warringah and finally, would come in last. For this reason, Bankstown would serve to be the most conducive local government authority to set up the child care centre. 3.1.3Income according to persons, place of residence Chart 1 The graph shows the income distribution of the different households within the local government areas in Zone 1 per week. The area of focus in this case will be the local government area with the highest population having the highest level of income. This means that the parents of these children are mostly busy working and there will be a higher chance that they will take their children to child care centres when they are not in school. In the chart, Bankstown ranks first with the highest population having to earn more than $1000. However, there is still a large population size that still earns less than $1000 weekly. The advantage here is that Bankstown has the highest population among the three local government areas. Kogarah comes in second and finally Warringah. 3.1.4. The rates of unpaid children care occurring LGA Bankstown (C) Kogarah (C) Warringah (A) Not stated 12542 2876 6588 Cared for own child/children and other child/children 732 202 1200 Cared for other child/children 8719 2803 8563 Cared for own child/children 27989 9304 26056 Did not provide child care 92824 30773 70027 Total 142806 45958 112434 The rates of unpaid children care occurring provide the best and worst areas in terms of the payments and settlement of the payments by the households. With reference to the rates of unpaid children care occurring, the best area with the lowest rates was Kogarah with a total of 45958 followed by Warringah with a total of 112434 and finally Bankstown with a total of 142806. Four main reasons were provided as reasons for the unpaid children care occurring. Among these reasons were the parents cared for their own children, others said that the parents and caregivers cared for other children, others provided that the cared for both their children and those of others. The most prevalent reason was that the children had already outgrown the age that they required to be taken care of. 3.2 Zone 2 3.2.1 Existing child care institutions in the region LGA Ashfield (A) Fairfield (C) Murray (A) Total Pre-school 534 2666 92 3292 Infants/Primary - Government 1585 10406 368 12359 Infants/Primary - Catholic 628 3461 65 4154 Infants/Primary - Other Non Government 227 909 92 1228 Total 2974 17442 617 21033 With reference to the zone 2 existing child care institutions in the region, the local government area with the fewest institutions will be the best region to start a new institution. In our case, Murray has the fewest institutions with a total of 617 institutions. The area is followed by Ashfield with 2974 institutions and finally Fairfield is the least preferred with 17,442 institutions. 3.1.2. Population density Ashfield (A) 41214 Fairfield (C) 187767 Murray (A) 6958 Total 235939 LGA Ashfield (A) Fairfield (C) Murray (A) Total 0-9 years 4394 25009 749 30152 10-19 years 3730 27561 833 32124 Total 8124 52570 1582 62276 Population density in this case will determine the size of households with children who will be taken to the children care centres. The area with the highest population in this case will be Fairfield with a population density of 187767 residents. Ashfield comes in second with almost a quarter of the total population of Fairfield. Ashfield’s population according to the 2011 census was 41214. Finally, the area with the lowest population was Murray with a total population density of 6958 3.1.3Income according to persons, place of residence INCP Nil income $1-$199 ($1-$10,399) $200-$299 ($10,400-$15,599) $300-$399 ($15,600-$20,799) $400-$599 ($20,800-$31,199) $600-$799 ($31,200-$41,599) $800-$999 ($41,600-$51,999) $1,000-$1,249 ($52,000-$64,999) $1,250-$1,499 ($65,000-$77,999) $1,500-$1,999 ($78,000-$103,999) $2,000 or more ($104,000 or more) Total Ashfield (A) 3264 2095 3130 3328 3486 3209 2771 2835 2100 2735 2767 31720 Fairfield (C) 16545 14168 25441 16967 16556 16096 11050 8941 4862 4251 2297 137174 Murray (A) 318 350 895 779 885 662 469 352 207 227 152 5296 Total 20127 16613 29466 21074 20927 19967 14290 12128 7169 7213 5216 174190 According to the incomes of the households, Fairfield comes first in having the highest population earning more than $1000 every week. The area is followed by Ashfield and finally Murray. 3.1.4. The rates of unpaid children care occurring LGA Ashfield (A) Fairfield (C) Murray (A) Total Not stated 2974 11457 453 14884 Cared for own child/children and other child/children 197 509 51 757 Cared for other child/children 1630 8408 426 10464 Cared for own child/children 6114 26602 979 33695 Did not provide child care 24085 102571 3864 130520 Total 35000 149547 5773 190320 As expected, due to the high population density in the area, Fairfield leads in the rate of unpaid children care occurring. The total number of unpaid children care occurring in Fairfield were 149547. Of these, 102571 of the parents and caregivers argued that the children did not require the child care while others took care of their own children or left them to other parents to take care of them. Ashfield comes in second with the highest population of unpaid children care occurring with a total of 35,000. Finally the area having the lowest rate of unpaid children care occurring was Murray with a total of 5773. 4.0 Conclusion Based on the analysis provided for the local government authorities, Bankstown and Fairfield would be the most suitable location to the establishment of the child care centres. The following reasons support this argument. i. For zone 1, the most important considerations are the income levels of the households and the population size of the children who fall within the age bracket of sixteen years and below. When it comes to the income levels of Bankstown, the biggest population size of the highest income earning population among the three local government authorities is in Bankstown. This means that the parents here may be busy working most of the time and as a result, they may need to take their children to the child care centres. Similarly, the high income earning population provides that the households have the ability to finance for the costs that are required to take their children to the child care centres. On the issue of population size, considering the population distribution of different areas in the country to be almost similar, then the higher the population density, the higher the number of eligible children for the child care centres. Just like any other business, the child care centres main aim is to ensure that they maximize their profits. For this reason, they will seek to ensure that they have more children enrolling to their institution. Bankstown has the biggest population among the three local government areas and as a result, they will influence the availability of their target population for the new child care centres. ii. Just like in Bankstown, the decision to establish a new children care centre in Fairfield will also be determined by the internal and external factors. The internal factors are mainly issues that concern the shareholders, employees and directors of the institutions. The external factors are diverse but some of the important consideration will be the demographics of the area. The population size, the income of the households in the area and the size of the target population in the area. The higher the population in the area, the higher the chances that there will be more children who will require to be take to the children care centres. Similarly, the higher the population with high income levels, the better it is for the establishment of the new children care centre. This is because the parents will likely be busy working in order to make such a large amount of money for the household. Similarly, the households with higher income levels will most likely have enough to take the children to the children care centres. Finally, the high population of children will mean that there will be likelihood that the children will be enrolled in the children care centres. Although this should be the main considerations that need to be made when deciding the location of the children care centres, there are other minor considerations that also need to be made such as the total number of institutions that exist in the area to serve the same purpose. High competition will result to poor performance of the institution in the area. 5.0 Recommendations Before the setting up of any business, it is important that the business takes into consideration the internal and external factors affecting the business. Some of the important issues that need to be taken into consideration are the demographics of the people living around the business. These demographics are the external factors affecting the performance of the organization and they need to be taken into consideration. These factors include; The areas where there is not adequate access to the outside school care at present. The proportion of working parents in the area should be high and their income should be equally high and the income should have low variability. The proportion of children in the area within the intended age group. The proportion of new migrants or internal migrants into the area should also be considered as it will determine the rates of unpaid children care occurring. If the new development of the child care centres considers these factors, then there is a high probability that they will enjoy a high inflow of children and minimal rates of unpaid children care occurring in the centres. As a result, the two new centres will enjoy an increase in the population of children attending the centres and at the same time, it will enjoy positive financial returns. 6.0 References Australian Bureau of statistics 2016, Sydney, 3218.0 - Regional Population Growth, Australia, 2014-15  http://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/mf/3218.0 South western sydney Lcoal health district. (2014). Fairfield: Local governemnt area. Sydney. 3. Census QuickStats 2011, Warringah (A) (LGA), accessed 4th May 2016, http://www.censusdata.abs.gov.au/census_services/getproduct/census/2011/quickstat/CED145?opendocument&navpos=220 4. Census QuickStats 2011, Kogarah (C) (LGA), accessed 4th May 2016, http://www.censusdata.abs.gov.au/census_services/getproduct/census/2011/quickstat/SSC11273?opendocument&navpos=220 5. Census QuickStats 2011, Bankstown(C) (LGA), accessed 4th May 2016, http://www.censusdata.abs.gov.au/census_services/getproduct/census/2011/quickstat/SSC10102?opendocument&navpos=220 Census QuickStats 2011, Fairfield(C) (LGA), accessed 4th May 2016, https://www.censusdata.abs.gov.au/webapi/jsf/tableView/customiseTable.xhtml Census QuickStats 2011, Ashfield (A) (LGA), accessed 3th May 2016, https://www.censusdata.abs.gov.au/webapi/jsf/tableView/customiseTable.xhtml Census QuickStats 2011, Warringah(A) (LGA), accessed 3th May 2016, https://www.censusdata.abs.gov.au/webapi/jsf/tableView/customiseTable.xhtml Read More