The issue of child sex abuse has been viewed as a male- dominated crime attributed to their masculine nature. However, currently females have also been associated with sexual abuse of children, especially online. The central question in the study revolves around how women get involved as online sex offenders abusing children.
Methodological approaches are broadly classified into two; quantitative and qualitative. Qualitative methods commonly involve three methods of data collection; direct observation, open ended interviews and secondary data analysis. Typically, data for qualitative evaluation is drawn from the field and is often useful in explaining how and why things happen the way they do. On the other hand quantitative methods involve data that is in numerical form. Quantitative data typically seeks to answer questions in the form of how often, how many, where and when. Mostly, questionnaires are used to obtain data when quantitative data is to be obtained.
The methodological approach used in the study is qualitative. This approach involves the use of data which has been acquired from both secondary and primary sources. For secondary data, post-arrest interview records obtained in the past last five years were used in the study. Secondly expert interviews were also used in which practitioners from the field of criminal justice were involved in 2010 (Martellozzo, Nehring and Taylor, 2010). The expert interviews helped in giving insights into the ongoing children sex abuse by women. The study also involved analyzing police reports relating to online female sex offenses with children as the victims. These were useful in offering insight into the extent of women involvement in such crimes. Yet again, the study involved accounts presented by online sex offenders. The questions asked in the interviews were exploratory thereby requiring descriptive answers. The use of open-ended questions during interviews, associated