Please boost your Plan to download papers
Coyne and Messina Articles, Part 1 Analysis
Pages 5 (1255 words)
The aspect of differences that exist in the works of Coyne and his group (2009), as well as Messina and his peers (2009), is premised on the fact that they both carry out different research studies, though these studies seek to identify, address and discuss matters that underpin the issuance of healthcare services and the operation of the healthcare sector.
Conversely, the aspect of similarity that espouse the work of Coyne and group to that of Messina and group is rooted in both parties confining their research activities to the healthcare sector, since both parties are interested in enabling relevant improvements in the same sector.
The studies conducted by Coyne’s and Messina’s groups are similar, since they are fundamentally interested in bettering the status and quality of the healthcare industry and the services it accords. To this effect, both groups choose dependent and independent variables and then research and analyze how these variables can be harnessed in order to improve the status of the American healthcare industry and services. Specifically, on one hand, Coyne and his group consider the relevance of causative variables like the type of hospital ownership and hospital size in furthering the cause of efficiency within the framework of healthcare services provision. On the other hand, Messina and his group research and scrutinize the nexus between patient satisfaction in teaching and nonteaching healthcare organizations, which practice inpatient admission. There is no gainsaying that patient satisfaction and efficiency are principle yardsticks of determining industrial success.
Not exactly what you need?